Angels and Pinheads

Today, the National Bureau of Economic Research announced that the recession that began in December of 2007 officially ended in June of 2009, some 14 months ago.  I’m sure relieved to hear that.  I’ll bet you are too.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the NBER goes on to “warn” that any future downturn would be a new recession and not a continuation of the last recession.  I’m going to take that warning to heart and head straight to the nearest army surplus store for some hip waders.

This kind of miss-the-forest-for-the-trees analysis drives me nuts.  It would be nice if respected publications like the Journal called it for the nonsense that it is.  Whether the economy is still shrinking or simply not growing is beside the point.  And nothing could be less important than a microscopic distinction as to whether a new downturn is or is not a separate recession.

The important point is this:  What we’ve been going through for the past three years is the first wave of reckoning for having lived beyond our means as a nation for the past 35 years.  1975 was the last year in which the United States ran a trade surplus.  Ever since then, we’ve been net importers, and our imports have been growing at an alarming rate.  That means dollars have been leaving.  In order to get them back (so we could import more stuff), we’ve been borrowing like crazy, both as a nation and as individuals.

The national debt is now $12 trillion, $8 trillion of which we’ve borrowed from overseas.  Personal and mortgage debt combined amount to another $13 trillion.  US GDP is a little under $15 trillion, so we owe about twice as much as we produce every year.  Since you can only repay debt with surplus cash, it’s going to take us a long time to pay those bills.

Actually, we’ll never pay them.  We will devalue the dollar until our debts become bearable – but that will make future borrowing much harder.  Think Greece, but much larger and without the olives.

We’ve also been conducting a national garage sale, selling off US assets to foreign interests.  That began in earnest in the 1980s, with Japanese companies snapping up US businesses and, especially, real estate.  It’s not the Japanese any more, but the trend continues.  Also in today’s Journal: an announcement that an Indian company is looking at buying MGM.

Deleveraging is slow and painful.  There is no easy way around it.  It calls for hard choices, and it will require sacrifice.  That, not whether a new recession would be separate or a continuation of the last one, is what we need to focus on.  Next month, I imagine that the National Bureau of Economic Research will finally tell us how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.  I don’t know where they’ll find the angels, but it seems to me that they have no shortage of pinheads.

2 thoughts on “Angels and Pinheads

  1. Again Dan has cut right through the misinformation disseminated by just about everyone from the screaming heads in the media to the politicians more worried about keeping their gravy train moving than in the health and future of the country…or the well being of the people.

    To avoid the train wreck coming we need some good engineers running things based on facts and reality rather than wishful thinking and disinformation. Seems to me that what we need is a few more Dan’s and a lot less tea.

  2. Holy crap Dan!

    Are you trying to tell me that the economy we have built based on being middlemen and resellers is not working?

    Teams of our best and brightest economists have been mapping out this path for decades. It works for Walmart, why not the country? Hmmmm.

    Don’t tell Ross Perot–it will crush him.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s